2005-2011
The wasted trust
|
|
The Ukrainian opposition, in its composition at the beginning of the 21st century, enjoyed support never seen before in the modern history of Ukraine and came to power thanks to massive public protests. Yet it failed to meet the nation’s expectations. In spite of having plans to solve the most burning issues of society, the opposition never implemented them. Even the changes that were indeed made, failed to become irreversible.
The result of the 2010 presidential election was not so much a victory of those currently in power, but a defeat of the previous government that – for subjective or partly objective reasons - failed to meet its promises, rise above political and personal conflicts, and withstand temptations generated by power in a corrupt post-soviet country.
-
The Orange leaders ended up with distorted priorities treating victory over their opponent partner as their top priority rather than the implementation of reforms declared during the campaign. To do so, they wasted the energy and efforts that could otherwise have been used to overcome corruption, restrict the influence of oligarchs, implement reforms and overcome resistance to reforms.
-
The pursuit of “defeating (their partner) no matter what” pushed Orange politicians into unions with their ideological opponents and populist moves that undermined the economy, especially in the middle of the financial crisis, and aggravated the business environment.
-
Internal squabbles also hampered resistance against external threats, including gas crises, trade wars and so on, and impeded European integration.
-
After the revolution, its leaders virtually lost contact with the people. Parties continued to be the “fan clubs of their leaders”, as has always been the case in Ukraine, used as tools for bringing to power those who have the necessary resources, rather than as means to seek and support allies for reform in society.
-
Meanwhile, social activists and NGOs failed to establish either an efficient partnership with the government or get it under their control.
In this section:
Revolution and Revival
Tricky Balance
20 Years of Balancing: What’s Next?
Related publications:
|
-
The culture of 'Muscovite Rus' came to form from two heterogeneous sources. The seed of the religious and artistic culture reached Muscovy from southeastern Europe (Byzantium, the Balkans) through Kyiv. On the other hand, the foundation of the political and legal culture came to Muscovy from 'Ulus Jöchi', better known as the Golden Horde. As a result, the Russian "spiritual culture" took the shape of a familiar European facade, behind which a non-European state infrastructure hid.
7 April,
-
German chancellor Olaf Scholz says Putin’s comments on US biological weapons seemed like an ‘implicit threat’
23 March,
-
It is us, Ukrainians, and all the citizens of this country, who must keep studying our own history. To defend our land and our country, we must know it better.
20 March,
-
86.6% of Russians tolerate and support the potential assault on the territory of the European Union, including: Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and others as evidenced by the results of the sociological survey conducted by “Active Group”
18 March,
-
Ukrainian troops with anti-tank weapons set ambushes, while their enemy slowly encircles cities to besiege them
12 March,
-
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has forced more than a million people to flee their homeland in just a week
3 March,
|
