17 April, 2013 14:15 ▪
Peter Hannaford: sanctions against Ukraine would have the opposite of the desired effect
“A democratic and economically strong Ukraine is important to the U.S. as well as to the EU. In a recent opinion article in the New York Times, former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, John Herbst, suggested that if Ukraine fails to meet the EU conditions the latter should invoke sanctions on Ukrainian political leaders (presumably Yanukovich and others). That would have the opposite of the desired effect. It would strengthen the clamor by a Ukrainian minority that is pushing for a new trade agreement with Moscow,” notes Hannaford.
“The EU should sign the final Agreement even if not every reform called for has been put into effect, provided a way is found to follow the Lutsenko action with one involving Tymoshenko. Once Ukraine is “in the tent” with the entire EU, it will be easier to continue pursuing the other reforms to a successful conclusion. Carrots are almost always better than sticks,”he believes.
READ ALSO: From Isolation to Sanctions?
- EU delays sanctions against Russia until June 30
- Ukraine signs Association Agreement with EU
- The Guardian: EU prepares for trade war with Russia
- US and EU discuss Ukraine sanctions
- The EUobserver: individual EU countries could impose unilateral sanctions against Ukrainian authorities
- Alexander Motyl: EU will never sign an Association Agreement with Ukraine’s version of Robert Mugabe
- Matthew Rojansky: scrutiny and criticism of Ukraine’s record on human rights and democracy issues will surely continue after the Association Agreement is signed
- Tadeusz Olszański: Lutsenko’s release is the only concession which President Yanukovych and his entourage are willing to make
- Pawel Kowal: Lutsenko`s pardon was the success of Ukrainian government, opposition, European diplomats and politicians but not that of Ukraine
- Business New Europe: nothing will happen in the talks with EU until Tymoshenko is released – and that is very unlikely to happen