Friday, November 22
Укр Eng
Log In Register
PoliticsNeighboursEconomicsSocietyCultureHistoryScienceOpinionsArchivePhoto Gallery
24 October, 2019

Another Trump defense in the Ukraine scandal bites the dust

Running out of options, Donald Trump touted one of his newer talking points this morning, publishing a tweet that Ukraine didn’t know that the White House was withholding military aid

As the president sees it, this detail is key because, in his mind, it knocks down the quid-pro-quo allegation.

As the story goes, in order for there to be extortion, one of the parties involved needs to know it’s being extorted. If Ukraine didn’t realize Trump had blocked aid, then there was no way for the Republican to have leverage over his counterpart in Kyiv.

Among the problems with this argument is that it appears to be completely wrong. The New York Times reported this morning:

[I]n fact, word of the aid freeze had gotten to high-level Ukrainian officials by the first week in August, according to interviews and documents obtained by The New York Times.

The problem was not a bureaucratic glitch, the Ukrainians were told then. To address it, they were advised, they should reach out to Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, according to the interviews and records.

The timing of the communications about the issue, which have not previously been reported, shows that Ukraine was aware the White House was holding up the funds weeks earlier than United States and Ukrainian officials had acknowledged. And it means that the Ukrainian government was aware of the freeze during most of the period in August when Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, and two American diplomats were pressing President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine to make a public commitment to the investigations being sought by Mr. Trump.

This reporting reinforces what the other evidence has already suggested. As the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent noted this morning, acting U.S. Ambassador Bill Taylor testified yesterday on U.S. officials telling the Ukrainian government that “the security assistance money would not come until Zelensky committed to pursue the Burisma investigation.”

What’s more, the Wall Street Journal reported last month that Ukrainian officials “expressed concern to U.S. senators that the [military] aid had been held up as a penalty for resisting that pressure” to investigate Joe Biden.

All of which suggests Ukraine was, in fact, well aware of the circumstances as Trump’s scheme unfolded.

I’m trying to think of a Republican argument that’s come up over the last month, intended to defend the White House, that’s stood up to scrutiny. Honestly, nothing comes to mind.


Related publications:

  • Federal prosecutors are planning to interview an executive with Ukraine’s state-owned gas company as part of an ongoing probe into the business dealings of Rudy Giuliani and two of his Soviet-born business associates
  • Who runs Ukraine on behalf of Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and why
    yesterday, Oleksandr Kramar
  • Russia has returned three navy boats to Ukraine almost a year after they were seized in the Black Sea off the Crimean Peninsula, officials say
    19 November,
  • Тhe Ukrainian Week speaks to former Minister of Foreign Affairs about the reasons for Russia’s pullout from the Geneva Conventions, the recognition of the Holodomor in Germany and the quality of Ukraine’s diplomatic communication with the world
    19 November, Alla Lazareva
  • PM Oleksiy Honcharuk and Minister of Finance Oksana Markarova met with the IMF mission head Ron van Rooden and mission's economist Gabor Pula to discuss the new EFF
    17 November,
  • Why did Volodymyr Zelenskiy need to lift immunity for MPs and how does this threaten Ukraine’s democracy?
    17 November, Maksym Vikhrov
Copyright © Ukrainian Week LLC. All rights reserved.
Reprint or other commercial use of the site materials is allowed only with the editorial board permission.
Legal disclaimer Accessibility Privacy policy Terms of use Contact us