Wednesday, November 22
Укр Eng
Log In Register
PoliticsNeighboursEconomicsSocietyCultureHistoryOpinionsArchivePhoto Gallery
15 March, 2014

Anatoliy Hrytsenko: "Vladimir Putin is an aggressor. This is a fundamental truth"

Ex-Defence Minister Anatoliy Hrytsenko comments on Russia's aggression, Ukraine's response to it and NATO

Putin's actions will first and foremost depend on how Ukraine acts. If we keep silent and beg about negotiations, he will act with maximum aggression. If we allow the Crimean pseudo referendum on March 16 at gunpoint, with all Ukrainian TV channels turned off there and the local population intimidated, we will have a completely different situation. Aksenov (self-proclaimed prime minister of Crimea – Ed.) and his friends may draw 70%, 80% or 120% in support of Russia in that referendum, but the number does not matter. It will then be like in Diego Maradona’s golden goal he scored with a hand in the World Cup but Argentina still won it. History will only remember the fact. The same thing will happen to Crimea. If the government is incapable of organizing defence, coordinating all actions of law enforcement agencies and arm the National Guard, it should do something atypical yet effective to stop Putin’s aggression. It can block the gas pipeline or oil pipes to exert pressure on the Kremlin’s wallet. It can close the borders entirely so that no Russian “tourists” get through to Ukraine. It can lay mines on the roads so that no Russian military machines get through to Ukraine and threaten people. There are many options but my impression is that we are simply sitting and waiting for the referendum to take place. Then we will pass a few angry resolutions in the Rada, hold an angry rally on the Maidan and the prosecutor will launch a few more cases against separatists. Then what? We will end up with dozens and hundreds of thousand refugees from Crimea who will not want to live under Putin. Our military personnel will be ousted from there, their property they earned over life confiscated. There is still some time for decisive action on all fronts.

RELATED ARTICLE: Volodymyr Ohryzko: “Ukraine has the moral and legal right to restore its nuclear status”

We don’t really need NATO overall. Instead, we need the US and the UK specifically, with the wide support of the entire NATO, of course. These are the countries that guaranteed our territorial integrity in the Budapest Memorandum as they demanded us to give up our nuclear potential in 1994. NATO troops do not have to shoot or threaten Russia. They don’t even have to supply us with weapons – we have enough of that on our own. Instead, they should ensure peace and demilitarization. They should ensure that not a single armoured vehicle or military aircraft gets to the Ukrainian territory uncontrolled. They should help us ensure a zone that is closed to any entry of Russian military cargo to Ukraine by air, land or sea. This is how they can help us fill the gap between Ukraine’s and Russia’s military capacity. 


Related publications:

  • November 21, the 4th anniversary of the Maidan, begins in Kyiv with a prayer for the Heavenly Hundred, the protesters killed at Instytutska Street in February 2014, and the victims of earlier shootings, police violence throughout the revolution
    yesterday, Stanislav Kozliuk
  • Ukraine’s Parliament has started to change the electoral system. Will they be able to finish the job and what will change if the reform goes through?
    day before yesterday, Andriy Holub
  • What political ambitions do Yulia Tymoshenko and her party hope to achieve before the 2019 elections?
    day before yesterday, Roman Malko
  • According to recent sociological studies, there have been no significant changes in the mood of Ukrainians over the last three years. The scarcity of demonstrations cannot be attributed to loyalty to the current government, but rather to the fact that the opposition is equally far away from understanding what the citizens need and how these needs can be met
    day before yesterday, Andriy Holub
  • Mostly discussed for its regulation of the language of instruction in schools, the new law offers more overlooked important innovations intended to change the quality and the content of education in Ukraine
    7 November, Hanna Trehub
  • The new law on the reintegration of the occupied parts of the Donbas qualifies them as such and names Russia as the occupier. Yet, it does not launch the process of deoccupation or change the mechanism envisaged in the Minsk Agreement
    20 October, Maksym Vikhrov
Copyright © Ukrainian Week LLC. All rights reserved.
Reprint or other commercial use of the site materials is allowed only with the editorial board permission.
Legal disclaimer Accessibility Privacy policy Terms of use Contact us