Monday, July 16
Укр Eng
Log In Register
PoliticsNeighboursEconomicsSocietyCultureHistoryOpinionsArchivePhoto Gallery
4 March, 2011

The Nitrogen Baron

Ukrainian fuel magnate Dmytro Firtash adds to his nitrogen empire
Dmytro Firtash has purchased another powerful chemical enterprise, the Cherkasy-based Azot plant, from the Kharkiv oligarch Oleksandr Yaroslavsky. Azot has 40 production units and churns out nearly two million tons of mineral fertilizers a year, or about 25% of the Ukrainian market. The price of the deal has not been released officially, but Mr. Yaroslavsky had earlier been reportedly asking USD 800 million. Whatever the deal with Firtash, the sale makes it appear that Yaroslavsky happy with the outcome. 
This means Firtash and his business associates have concentrated the production of 100% of saltpeter, 80% of carbamide, and 75% of ammonia in Ukraine in their hands. The monopoly on the fertilizer market is an excellent springboard for further expansion into the agroindustrial sector. Firtash controls four of the six Ukrainian plants that produce nitrogen fertilizers (see more on this in  The Ukrainian Week, Is. 6, 2001). The two other enterprises are DniproAZOT (owned by Ihor Kolomoisky) and the Odesa Portside Plant (which so far remains state property).
The monopolization of the chemical industry in Ukraine has a geopolitical implication — experts do not rule out that Mr. Firtash’s assets will be merged with Russian counterpats, while informed open sources even indicate the proportion will be 25:75. The reader will remember that in 2009, Gazprom’s SIBUR expressed interest in buying the Odesa Portside Plant from the state. By bringing the chemical industry and hence the fertilizer market under its control, Russian capital will easily be able to monopolize the Ukrainian agricultural sector as well.

Related publications:

  • From the Lisbon Protocol to the Budapest Memorandum. When, why and how the concept of Ukraine’s status as a non-nuclear weapon state was designed? Declaration of Ukraine’s status as a non-nuclear weapon state and strengthening of its independent statehood. Negotiations on the outline of Ukraine’s non-nuclear weapon state status under international law: process and outcome. The time of wasted opportunities. Budapest Memorandum: a historic mistake or inadequate actions by Ukraine’s government? Modern model to guarantee Ukraine’s security as a non-nuclear weapon state.
    day before yesterday, Volodymyr Vasylenko
  • The Ukrainian Week spoke with Germany’s special envoy to Ukraine on reform in governance and decentralization, Georg Milbradt, about German government assistance in the implementation of reforms and about the successes and difficulties faced in this process.
    13 July, Olha Vorozhbyt
  • Why are Ukraine’s public finances starting to look shaky?
    11 July, Lyubomyr Shavalyuk
  • Ukraine’s economy has nearly recovered to prewar levels, but for it to go into higher gear, there needs to be a serious a shift in policy priorities
    10 July, Oleksandr Kramar
  • As Ukraine introduces participatory budgeting, what is likely to be the social impact?
    9 July, Maksym Vikhrov
  • Volodymyr Tatlin and his place in the Malevich’s circle in Kyiv
    8 July, Tetiana Filevska
Copyright © Ukrainian Week LLC. All rights reserved.
Reprint or other commercial use of the site materials is allowed only with the editorial board permission.
Legal disclaimer Accessibility Privacy policy Terms of use Contact us